Follow Up to “Is There an Historical Adam?” by Tremper Longman

Here is an essay by Tremper Longman.  This is a follow-up to his earlier video comments on the historicity of Adam. It seems that Longman’s non-literal understanding of Adam is driven by his desire to harmonize evolution and Genesis.  Longman states. “It is wrong to challenge people to choose between the Bible and the science of evolution as if you can only believe that one or the other is true. They are not in conflict.”

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s